+28
Incorrect Passwords Should be Honored if they're Close Enough, amirite?
by Anonymous8 months ago
This is a terrible idea.
by jadon508 months ago
please never go into cybersecurity 😂
by Anonymous8 months ago
OP 10000000000000% has a vulnerable password.
by Anonymous8 months ago
OP you understand why passwords exist, right? It's to keep other people out. You want someone else to get access to your account because they were "close enough"?
by Anonymous8 months ago
And that's exactly how you get hacked, someone hears the password but not the capitalization and boom theyre in
by robb878 months ago
No. First of all, what you want isn't possible, second, it's stupid
by Anonymous8 months ago
Such a bad and dumb complaint not an opinion.
by donnellpurdy8 months ago
I personally wouldn't feel safe with that. I know it's so frustrating sometimes but it's so much better knowing your accounts are safe. Depending on what it is, someone getting in could really screw up your life.
by Anonymous8 months ago
This is not even possible as long as the most basic security standards are followed. Passwords aren't stored as is but instead are hashed. Therefore even changing only one character, the saved hash is completely different. To give you a simple example, this is wat hashes look like: Thisismypassword => dfbec338b51c5643ba481625e1075236d3a9a07fbd6393763f253e99024958a4 thisismypassword => 1da9133ab9dbd11d2937ec8d312e1e2569857059e73cc72df92e670928983ab5
by Huge_Pound21568 months ago
Also, to further elaborate, there hashing functions are what's known as "one way." That is, you can't just reverse the algorithm and get the hashed password back. You can only go from password->hash. When you enter a password in a text box, the website or whatever runs that text box through the hash and compares that value with the stored hash value
by Admirable_Dig_55838 months ago
Found the guy that uses "Password1234"
by Zestyclose_Share8 months ago
So basically you want like 400 passwords that can get into your account instead of just one
by Anonymous8 months ago
You wanna get hacked? This is how you get hacked.
by Anonymous8 months ago
You're totally right that stupidness is unpopular.
by braulio278 months ago
Fun fact: Apple phones have a feature (idk if Android has it too) where it has a list of the most common letters after a certain other letter, and increases that next letter's "hit box" so even if you miss it a bit, it'll still type that letter. If you have an iPhone, you know that some words are just more difficult to type fast on and you'll often misspell it, as the area of that next letter is going to be a bit smaller compared to the letter next to that one. I think they do this with passwords too because I use very similar passwords for most of my social medias and sometimes I'm like "wow, I probably completely messed up my password" just based on the feel, and it'll let me in.
by Infamous_Salary8 months ago
Hunter2
by Anonymous8 months ago
The computer should give you a hint each time you get it wrong too! /s
by liam138 months ago
Let me make this simple for you to understand. Let's assume that your password can consist only of the lowercase alphabet and can only be 5 characters long. You can have 265 unique passwords this way. But if I allow one character mismatch, you'd have 264 unique passwords. 265 is almost 12 million, 264 is less than half a million. If I were to try all possible combinations of 5 lower case alphabet, at 100 combinations a second on a potato PC, it will take about 33 hours. If I were to try all possible combinations of 4 lower case letters, it would take me only 1.5 hours. I can change the position of the incorrect letter (fix the first character, try all 4 character combinations for the remaining characters, then fix the second character and so on), I'd have your password on that potato PC in 6 hours. I hope that puts it into perspective of how bad of an idea your unpopular opinion is.
by Calm-Stable20698 months ago
This is just stupid. If you call someone, and you're one number off, should you still get connected to the person you're trying to call?
by That-Bodybuilder-1788 months ago
This isn't just unpopular, it's stupid
by Anonymous8 months ago
Would probably decrease vulnerability equivalent to maybe a reduction of 3 characters Would honestly not be so bad if everyone had 25 character password, but at that point would this idea really help much? (For the actual math, its probably % based or a % that increases with more characters, hard to envision the full math without actually trying to work it out).
by Anonymous8 months ago
Don't make me tap the bloody sign
by Anonymous8 months ago
Absolutely not. I'm not making my PC even less secure than it already is. I don't want people getting into things like my stock portfolio or my online banking because the password was "close enough".
by Anonymous8 months ago
I'm crying. This is the most amazing idea. I agree. If we're almost there, just give it to us. Please.
by jadon50 8 months ago
by Anonymous 8 months ago
by Anonymous 8 months ago
by Anonymous 8 months ago
by robb87 8 months ago
by Anonymous 8 months ago
by donnellpurdy 8 months ago
by Anonymous 8 months ago
by Huge_Pound2156 8 months ago
by Admirable_Dig_5583 8 months ago
by Zestyclose_Share 8 months ago
by Anonymous 8 months ago
by Anonymous 8 months ago
by braulio27 8 months ago
by Infamous_Salary 8 months ago
by Anonymous 8 months ago
by liam13 8 months ago
by Calm-Stable2069 8 months ago
by That-Bodybuilder-178 8 months ago
by Anonymous 8 months ago
by Anonymous 8 months ago
by Anonymous 8 months ago
by Anonymous 8 months ago
by Anonymous 8 months ago
by Equivalent_Belt8507 8 months ago
by Anonymous 8 months ago
by Mammoth-Resident 8 months ago
by cristmerl 8 months ago