-38 Indiana jones movies do not hold up, amirite?

by Anonymous 2 days ago

It's called fun. Not everything has to be super edgy (Deadpool and Wolverine) or grim dark (waves hands generously) or have something happening every 2 seconds. They are just fun. Raiders is as good as it ever was, Crusade's has only dropped slightly, and Temple is still Temple. The tank set piece in Crusade is still better than the majority of set pieces now a days. Everyone thinks they need big explosions and insane stakes just because CGI lets them put whatever they want on screen.

by Anonymous 2 days ago

The three Indiana Jones movies are perfect exactly as they are. He is America's answer to James Bond, with the perfect mix of action and humor. Of the three, Temple of Doom is definitely my favorite.

by BowlUpstairs 2 days ago

It's a cozy imaginary world with adventures and mysteries. Some people doesn't need more.

by Far_Resolve 2 days ago

Do you understand the concept of a "movie"? Have you watched Fast & Furious or ANYTHING that the worst actor on the planet - Tom Cruise is in? How realistic are any of those?

by korbin27 2 days ago

Tell me you're a zoomer who expects Marvel level CGI and action from a 40yo movie without telling me you're one. Indiana Jones films were meant to be "cartoonist" comedic action/adventure films for the entire family to watch.

by Patient-Tie9568 2 days ago

Raiders still holds up. Last Crusade didn't even though, it's most people's favorite. The compsiting doesn't look good at all.

by ShoulderCurious2838 2 days ago

Well duh. Anything after Temple is pretty bad.

by ShoulderCurious2838 2 days ago

Go watch a Shakespearean play then, not everybody can appreciate different genres and styles

by Dry_Aioli 2 days ago

This is the case with all Lucas films.

by Anonymous 2 days ago

Well, they're 40 year old B movies they are not supposed to be Oscar winning dramas.

by Interesting_Post7206 2 days ago